- Title
- Perceptions of the effectiveness of using patient encounter data as an education and reflection tool in general practice training
- Creator
- Klein, Linda; Bentley, Michael; Norris, Racheal; Holliday, Elizabeth; Magin, Parker; Moad, Dominica; Fielding, Alison; Tapley, Amanda; van Driel, Mieke; Davey, Andrew; Mundy, Ben; FitzGerald, Kristen; Taylor, Jennifer
- Relation
- Journal of Primary Health Care Vol. 16, Issue 1, p. 12-20
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/hc22158
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2024
- Description
- Introduction: Patient encounter tools provide feedback and potentially reflection on general practitioner (GP) registrars’ in-practice learning and may contribute to the formative assessment of clinical competencies. However, little is known about the perceived utility of such tools. Aim: To investigate the perceived utility of a patient encounter tool by GP registrars, their supervisors, and medical educators (MEs). Methods: General practice registrars, supervisors and MEs from two Australian regional training organisations completed a cross-sectional questionnaire. Registrars rated how Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), a patient encounter tool, influenced their reflection on, and change in, clinical practice, learning and training. Supervisors’ and MEs’ perceptions provided contextual information about understanding their registrars’ clinical practice, learning and training needs. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 48% of registrars (n = 90), 22% of supervisors (n = 182), and 61% of MEs (n = 62). Most registrars agreed that ReCEnT helped them reflect on their clinical practice (79%), learning needs (69%) and training needs (72%). Many registrars reported changing their clinical practice (54%) and learning approaches (51%). Fewer (37%) agreed that ReCEnT influenced them to change their training plans. Most supervisors (68%) and MEs (82%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars’ clinical practice. Similarly, most supervisors (63%) and MEs (68%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars’ learning and training needs. Discussion: ReCEnT can prompt self-reflection among registrars, leading to changes in clinical practice, learning approaches and training plans. Reaching its potential as an assessment for learning (as opposed to an assessment of learning) requires effective engagement between registrars, their supervisors and MEs.
- Subject
- clinical practice; general practice registrars; health care education; patient encounter data; performance and evaluation; primary health care; SDG 4; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1504399
- Identifier
- uon:55511
- Identifier
- ISSN:1172-6164
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 262
- Visitors: 262
- Downloads: 0